09.09.2026
Blog

Flanders' top 15% benchmark has changed. What does it mean for real estate investors?

Latest update of VEKA for non-residential EPC certificate
Virginia marinova v1lg9kumkvu unsplash

The Flemish Energy and Climate Agency (VEKA) has updated its official benchmark for non-residential EPC certificates. The changes may appear marginal, but they reveal something far more significant than a revised energy threshold. They expose the true state of the Flemish commercial building stock and highlight why investors should look beyond simple Taxonomy compliance. The benchmark, now based on 36,389 registered EPC NR certificates, has almost tripled in size since its first publication.

While the threshold required to rank among the top 15% most energy-efficient buildings has increased slightly, this should not be interpreted as progress. Quite the opposite.

A growing database reveals the true state of the market

When VEKA published its first benchmark, based on approximately 12,400 EPC NR certificates filed in 2023 and 2024, the top 15% threshold stood at 267 kWh/m²/year across all building functions and 206 kWh/m²/year for offices. Fast forward to June 2026. The database has nearly tripled to 36,389 registered EPC NRs. One might expect a larger and more representative sample to confirm or even strengthen the benchmark. Instead, the thresholds have moved upwards, reaching 274 kWh/m²/year across all functions and 210 kWh/m²/year for office buildings.

The explanation is simple. The top-performing buildings have not become less efficient. Rather, thousands of lower-performing buildings have entered the database as owners progressively complied with EPC obligations. This shifts the overall distribution upwards, resulting in a higher energy consumption threshold for the top 15%. The paradox is striking: qualifying for the EU Taxonomy in Flanders is becoming easier, not because buildings are improving, but because the average building entering the database performs worse. Rather than signalling progress, the new benchmark highlights how much of the Flemish commercial building stock still requires significant energy improvements.

A benchmark that remains modest in Europe

The updated figures also put Flanders into a broader European perspective.

Today, an office building consuming 210 kWh/m²/year qualifies among the top 15% of the Flemish building stock. In comparison, Brussels currently applies a threshold of 121 kWh/m²/year for non-residential buildings. Although methodologies differ, high-performing office buildings in the Netherlands, Germany and Luxembourg generally achieve significantly lower primary energy consumption levels than the current Flemish top 15% benchmark.

The conclusion is clear.

A building that qualifies as Taxonomy-aligned in Flanders would not necessarily be considered a top-performing asset elsewhere. For investors managing cross-border portfolios, this makes meaningful comparisons increasingly difficult and raises important questions about the consistency of sustainability benchmarks across European markets. This matters for investors seeking consistent ESG reporting, reliable portfolio benchmarking and credible sustainability claims across different jurisdictions.

Why investors should look beyond compliance

The top 15% benchmark is more than an EPC indicator. It is the official reference used to determine whether an existing building satisfies the energy performance criterion of the EU Taxonomy, making it increasingly relevant for sustainable finance, ESG reporting and investment decisions.

However, regulatory compliance should not become the end goal. Occupiers, lenders and institutional investors are steadily raising their expectations. Buildings that merely satisfy today's benchmark may struggle to remain competitive as regulations tighten, financing criteria evolve and occupiers increasingly favour genuinely high-performing assets. The real question is therefore no longer whether an asset complies today. It is whether it will continue to create value tomorrow.

The investors who create the greatest long-term value will not necessarily be those whose assets comply with today's benchmark, but those who anticipate tomorrow's market expectations before they become regulatory requirements.

More info VEKA Flanders

Future-proof your portfolio

At Pulse, we help investors and asset managers understand where their assets stand today and identify the interventions that create the greatest long-term value while balancing CAPEX, energy performance, regulatory resilience and market attractiveness. Our multidisciplinary approach combines technical expertise, financial analysis and ESG insights to build pragmatic revalorisation roadmaps that protect asset value while preparing portfolios for tomorrow's market.

Pulse
We use cookies for operational purposes, statistical analyses, in order to personalize your experience.
Cookies settings